Government Spending Category

“How to Fix The Economy? Sometimes Less is More”

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

As Washington begins to re-float the idea of another “stimulus,” USA Today advises: “Don’t just stand there – do nothing.”

As the economic recovery falters, pressure is mounting on policymakers to do something —anything — to boost growth, preferably before Election Day.

In response to this clamor for another short-term stimulus, here’s one piece of advice: Don’t just stand there — do nothing. More government borrowing and spending would accomplish little but provide lawmakers yet another rationale for delaying the day of reckoning.

But for now, with depression off the table and about 30% of the $814 billion stimulus still in the pipeline, it’s time for government to start following the lead of its people and businesses. Instead of passing a minor stimulus that would be almost meaningless in the context of global economic trends, Washington should focus on the big picture. The national debt stands at $13.4 trillion, or $104,000 for every U.S. household. And even that is just a prelude to the horrific numbers projected over the next two decades as the result of surging expenditures on health care and retirement.

Acting to slow the growth in benefit programs such as Social Security and Medicare would not only forestall economic Armageddon down the road, it also might actually be the best thing for the economy now. It would restore confidence among investors that the nation is not heading for a major credit crisis or a period of hyperinflation.

Unemployment rate increases to 9.6 percent

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

August was another bleak month for the country’s employment situation. This morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the unemployment rate was 9.6 percent last month, up from 9.5 percent in July.

There was some good news in today’s release: the private sector added 67,000 jobs, including 27,000 jobs in the construction industry and 8,000 jobs in the mining industry.

However, the number of people now unemployed stands at 14.9 million. Of those, 6.9 million have been unemployed for over 27 weeks.

Since May, the jobless rate remained in the range of 9.5 to 9.7 percent.  If one thing is clear, it’s this: Washington needs a new approach to economic policy.

Friday Funnies: 5 jokes about government spending

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

5

Cartoon: Double Dips

4

“Congress is very upset with Roger Clemens because they feel like they were lied to. Good! Now they know how we feel.” – Jay Leno

3

Cartoon: Chinese Economy

2

The Onion: Pentagon Ripped Off By Shady Weapons Dealer

1

“They say the recession is good for people because fewer people drive to work which means fewer deaths in auto accidents. Fewer people can afford to eat, so we don’t gain enough weight. You know what that means? President Obama’s economic plan is also his healthcare plan. It’s genius!” – Jay Leno

State News Roundup

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Here’s a look at some of this week’s most interesting, and consequential, budget- and economy-related issues in the 50 states:

The Virginian Pilot reported last week that for 12 years, a government employee in Norfolk, VA drew pay and benefits without a day on the job.

Late last week, the Denver Post called for a balanced budget amendment, saying “reckless spending by both parties has left Americans with an unsustainable $13 trillion federal debt, which is still getting “rapidly worse.’”

Jim Kelly argues in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette that we need to cut more than just defense spending. “We’re in a fiscal emergency. We have to watch what we spend even on vitally important things. So the question isn’t why cut defense spending? It’s why cut only defense spending?”

In an editorial, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette laments the sad state of the economy and the inability of lawmakers to generate solutions. “A worrisome part of the problem is the government doesn’t seem to know what to do to end the suffering.”

The Cincinnati Enquirer reported that the increase in federal funds received by Ohio in 2009 outpaced the national average. Across the country, federal domestic spending increased 16%. Ohio saw a 19% increase in federal dollars compared to 2008.

According to the New York Times, state tax revenues increased 2.2% in the second quarter of 2010. “The greatest year-over-year growth in percentage terms was in Alaska, where revenues shot up 106.3 percent.”

Definition of the Week: Mark-up

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

A mark up is a meeting a committee holds in order to review and discuss a piece of legislation. Members of the committee may propose changes to a bill by offering amendments. Each change is voted on individually. Once all of the changes are either incorporated or denied, the bill is voted on by the full committee. If the bill is passed it will go to the full chamber for a vote.

Congressional misuse of taxpayer provided travel funds

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that at least six lawmakers are under investigation for misusing taxpayer money intended for overseas travel expenses (Congressional rules allow members of the House and Senate to receive daily allowances for meals, cabs and other official travel-related expenses).

The House Ethics Committee is looking into whether some of these funds were instead used to purchase gifts, or pay for spouses’ travel.

According to The Journal, the amount allotted can “add up to more than $1,000 a trip for longer visits to expensive regions.” But as it is common for lawmakers’ “meals and expenses [to be] picked up by other people, such as foreign government officials or U.S. ambassadors…That can leave lawmakers with leftover money [which they] routinely keep or spend on gifts, shopping or to cover their spouses’ travel expenses, according to dozens of current and former lawmakers.”

While several Members have been questioned by Ethics — including Reps. Robert Aderholt (R-AL), G.K. Butterfield (D-NC), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Solomon Ortiz (D-TX), Joe Wilson (R-SC), and former Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN) — some staff are questioning whether the alleged misuse of taxpayer dollars really warrants an investigation, According to The Journal, a spokeswoman for one of the Members said: “Focusing on personal purchases under $2 while over 14 million Americans are out of work does not reflect the priorities of the American people.”

We agree that Congress should be concentrating on our greatest economic and fiscal challenges. And it is important to note, as did The Journal, that there is currently “no system for lawmakers to return excess travel funds when they return to the U.S.”

But if Washington is unwilling even to control its spending on the small things ($2 bucks!!), how are American taxpayers supposed to trust them to tackle the country’s nearly $13.4 trillion debt?

Public Pulse: stimulus and tax cuts

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

According to Rasmussen, 47% of likely voters say they are more worried government will do “too much” in reacting to the nation’s economic problems; 44% are more worried government will do too little.


According to Ipsos/Reuters, 49% off Americans would prefer to extend all the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts; 31% would only extend the tax cuts for people earning less than $200,000; and 15% would allow all of the tax cuts to expire.


According to Rasmussen, 38% of likely voters say last year’s stimulus helped the economy. 36% now say it hurt the economy. 21% say it had no impact.


ICYMI: “Government Pay: Now For The Really Bad News”

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

In an August 30th piece, Forbes joins the discussion on public- vs. private-sector pay disparities, and offers a look at the consequences – current and future – should this trend continue.

By now, most Americans are familiar with the newly revealed statistics concerning federal pay. As we slept, as it were, our federal minders awarded themselves impressive pay/benefits increases that average out to $123,000 per year, compared with $61,000 in the private sector.

This is remarkable on its face considering that those of us in the private sector produce goods and services to earn our wages, while a federal government that lacks resources must expropriate our wealth in order to fund its own activities. To put it simply, federal employees have enjoyed larger average pay and benefits increases for nine straight years, and their benefactor has been us.

If it’s true that government workers are more educated and in possession of greater skills, then it’s also true that a still-difficult economic situation has been made more difficult by virtue of some of our best and brightest offering their skills to the inefficient government sector over the private economy. Their gain is the recessed economy’s loss.

It should also be remembered the perverse incentives that exist among federal workers. Not able to advance based on profits, and doing more with less, workers in the government succeed the more the bureaucracy they work for grows, the more lawsuits they win against private actors, the more regulations they impose, and the more fines/fees they lift from the increasingly empty hands of the average American taxpayer.

Not only are we fleeced to cover the rising pay and gold-plated benefits of federal workers, we’re essentially paying them to make our lives more difficult. The more they’re able to do so, the more they advance.

Contrary to the conventional wisdom suggesting that it’s our grandchildren that will pay the bill for an out-of-control government, the more realistic truth is that we’re paying the government tab right now through high, and soon to be higher taxes, along with reduced innovation and productivity in the for-profit sector thanks to Washington bidding limited human and financial capital away from the productive parts of the economy. We must always consider the “unseen,” and in this case it’s the wealth we won’t create and the companies that will not materialize thanks to the greedy hand of the federal government.

So while it’s surely bad news to find out that how well compensated our federal employees have come to be on our dime, the greater shame here is what this means for the U.S. economy as a whole. Washington is in hiring mode with our dollars, and we’re set to pay for its spendthrift ways through less capital formation, lower wages and reduced innovation.

Click here to read the entire article.

Second stimulus won’t spur economic growth

Monday, August 30th, 2010

There is little doubt Americans are feeling anxious and uncertain about the U.S. economy. According to a CBS poll, 83% of Americans think the economy is in “bad” shape; 37% even say it’s in permanent decline. Economists are uneasy as well. As we pointed out last week, GDP growth for the second quarter of 2010 was just revised down to a dismal 1.6%.

So begins a new push for a second stimulus. Laura Tyson, a professor at University of California-Berkeley’s business school, advocates for one in The New York Times today. Tyson argues the first stimulus worked well, but because it’ll run out soon, Congress must pass another. She then lays out a laundry list of spending initiatives Congress should pass.

Tyson believes the nation’s debate about economic policy has focused too much on reducing the deficit and too little on reducing unemployment.

As we’ve noted before, Harvard economist Robert Barro has explained why government “stimulus” spending is a bad deal for American taxpayers and is not an effective means for creating jobs. In February he explained, “[V]iewed over five years, the fiscal stimulus package is a way to get an extra $600 billion of public spending at the cost of $900 billion in private expenditure.” In other words, the federal government was trading $9 for $6 dollars. A month earlier he suggested Congress concentrate more on “incentives for people and businesses to invest, produce and work. … [W]e should not be considering massive public-works programs that do not pass muster from the perspective of cost-benefit analysis.”

Economists in a new survey by the National Association for Business Economics (NABE) seem to agree more with Barro than Tyson. Those surveyed do not think a second stimulus would help growth. 58% are against allocating more federal money. NABE President Lynn Reaser sums up the survey: “The near-term focus should be the promotion of economic growth…Respondents also do not believe another stimulus package is necessary but think the various tax cuts should be extended beyond their scheduled expiration at year-end.”

Top 3: last week’s most popular posts

Monday, August 30th, 2010

New video: How the American public views its government

Fiscal Cheat Sheet: Consequences (state)

Extravagant schools show politicians’ twisted priorities