Posts Tagged ‘American Recovery and Reinvestment Act’

A state of recovery? New Hampshire edition.

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

In preparation for Vice President Biden’s visit today to Manchester, New Hampshire to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and “mark a Recovery Act milestone,” below are some facts to consider:

New Hampshire’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill received: $395,322,052
This is 0.5% of the $85.7 billion that has been received by states. (Last updated: 8/24/2010)

New Hampshire’s share of the population = 0.4%

New Hampshire’s unemployment rate was 5.5% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; for July 2010, the rate was 5.8%.

New Hampshire’s 5.8% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

New Hampshire lost 5,400 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and July 2010.

For FY2011, New Hampshire is on track to overspend by $365 million. (Last updated: 7/15/2010)

New Hampshire’s number of foreclosed homes was 739 when the “stimulus” was enacted; that number has since grown to 835.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

$145,000 of federal stimulus funds were used to buy iPod Touch’s for sixth graders at Somersworth Middle School in New Hampshire. Superintendent Karen Soule said the devices are important to district’s mission of making students more “technology literate.”

A state of recovery? Washington edition.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

In preparation for President Obama’s visit today to Seattle, Washington to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Washington’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill received: $2,686,849,584
This is 3.1% of the $85.7 billion that has been received by states. (Last updated: 8/10/2010)

Washington’s share of the population = 2.1%

Washington’s unemployment rate was 8.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.9%.

Washington’s 8.9% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Washington lost 68,600 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Washington is on track to overspend by $2.1 billion. (Last updated: 7/15/2010)

Washington’s number of foreclosed homes was 3,076 when the “stimulus” was enacted; that number has since grown to 5,072.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

A highway beautified by fish art in Washington was financed with $10,000 in stimulus funds. 12 silvery Chinook salmon decorated a landscaping median on Canal Drive in Washington.  I’m sure the salmon fish art is beautiful, but spending $10,000 for metal fish smells a little fishy.

The state of the States

Friday, August 13th, 2010

This summer, White House officials have been traveling all over the country on a “Recovery Summer” tour.  The general purpose of the tour is to tout the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus” bill) as essential in saving and creating “millions” of jobs and encouraging economic growth. However, with a stalled economy and growing unemployment, we decided to take a closer look.  We’ve compiled a fact sheet for each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia and have found a very different story than that being told on the “Recovery Summer” tour.

Click here to view the fact sheets and see how your state’s economy has performed since the “stimulus” was enacted.

Administration officials continue “Recovery Summer” tour

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Continuing the Administration’s “Recovery Summer” tour today, the President visits Chicago; Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood visits Columbus, OH; Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Kathleen Merrigan visits Fairfax County, Virginia; and Federal Highways Deputy Administrator Greg Nadeaus visits Brownsville, Texas.

In preparation for Administration officials’ travel to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, we take a closer look at the current economic conditions in these four states.

Illinois

Illinois’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $8,467,750,000
(=3.9% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Illinois’s share of the population = 4.2%

Illinois’s unemployment rate was 8.7% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 10.4%.

Illinois’s 10.4% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

Illinois lost 155,000 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Illinois’s estimated budget shortfall is $13.5 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Illinois’s number of foreclosed homes was 14,218 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 14,732.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Northwestern University received $712,883 to develop a model of machine-generated humor.  The project will “create intelligent comedic performance agents and deploy them both on- and off-line for the enjoyment and illumination of everyday citizens.”

Ohio

Ohio’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $7,874,070,000
(=3.6% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Ohio’s share of the population = 3.8%

Ohio’s unemployment rate was 9.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 10.5%.

Ohio’s 10.5% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

Ohio lost 131,500 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Ohio’s estimated budget shortfall is $3 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Ohio’s number of foreclosed homes was 11,321 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has fallen to 10,639.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

$34 million will be going to Ohio’s John Weld Peck Federal Building in Cincinnati, which is only 46 years old, for a “window makeover.”

Virginia

Virginia’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $5,425,020,000
(=2.5% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Virginia’s share of the population = 2.6%

Virginia’s unemployment rate was 6.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 7.0%.

Virginia’s 7.0% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Virginia lost 39,500 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Virginia’s estimated budget shortfall is $1.3 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Virginia’s number of foreclosed homes was 4,823 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 5,855.

Examples of “stimulus” spending:

$80,000 of stimulus funds financed a pedestrian bridge to nowhere in West Virginia.

$51 million was allocated to the Poff Federal building in Roanoke, Virginia for ‘green’ adjustments, such as new windows and lighting.

Texas

Texas’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $14,307,390,000
(=6.5% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Texas’s share of population = 8.1%

Texas’s unemployment rate was 6.8% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.2%.

Texas’s 8.2% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Texas lost 57,700 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Texas’s estimated budget shortfall is $4.6 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Texas’s number of foreclosed homes was 10,527 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 12,175.

Wednesday Waste: $1 million in stimulus for iPods

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

$1 million in emergency “stimulus” funds will be used to buy 1,600 iPod Touch devices for high school students in Utah.

The million-dollar iPod buy is just one of 100 questionable economic “stimulus” projects highlighted in a report released yesterday by Senators Tom Coburn (OK) and John McCain (AZ).

Administrators and students from the school that received the funding defended the iPod purchase as important for educational use, and as a nice perk for students:

From KSL.com:

Kearns High School Assistant Principal John Anderson says the iPods are not toys for students, but tools for learning. He says giving students an iPod is almost like giving them a laptop, but without the expense of a computer lab.

Teachers will spend the first two months of the school year learning how to use iPods in their instruction. Students will begin using the devices as early as November.

From the Salt Lake Tribune:

Michael Bagley, who will also be a Kearns senior in the fall, said he’s excited students will be allowed to keep them if they graduate on-time.

“I think that will be the coolest thing ever,” Bagley said. “I think that might be a little initiative for those who are thinking of not graduating to graduate, kind of a going-away present.”

It is certainly arguable that iPods can be used for educational purposes; no problem there.

But no one can defend using even one of the trillion dollars Washington passed under “emergency” designation (so it could spend this money in addition to its regular budget increases, and outside of PAYGO rules) to buy iPods for students.

This use of taxpayer money is also indefensible as it has nothing to do with what Washington expressly promised taxpayers it would use their trillion dollars to accomplish: bolster growth to help create jobs and keep unemployment at bay.

Spending Alert

ICYMI: “Republicans decry stimulus funds for iPods, cellphones”

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Today’s LA Times discusses the report on wasteful stimulus-funded projects that was debuted today by Senators Tom Coburn and John McCain:

Stimulus money is going toward iPods for high school students in Utah, cellphones for smokers trying to quit in Washington and advertising devoted to the promotion of…the stimulus.

The findings are part of a 74-page report put out by a pair of Republican senators who contend the $862-billion program is fraught with needless spending.

“There is no question job creation should be a national priority, but torrential, misdirected government spending is not the way to do it,” reads the introduction, signed by Republican Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and John McCain of Arizona.

Dubbed the “Summertime Blues,” Senators Coburn and McCain highlight 100 wasteful projects funded by “stimulus” dollars.  65 questionable spending items are showcased in bankruptingamerica.org’s March Madness series.

Click here to read the entire LA Times article.

Click here to download the “Summertime Blues” report.

A state of recovery? Wisconsin edition.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

In preparation for Transportation Secretary LaHood’s visit today to Watertown, Wisconsin to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Wisconsin’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $3,260,660,000
(=1.6% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

Wisconsin’s share of population = 1.8%

Wisconsin’s unemployment rate was 7.7% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 7.9%.

Wisconsin’s 7.9% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Wisconsin lost 82,000 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Wisconsin’s estimated budget shortfall is $3.4 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Wisconsin’s number of foreclosed homes was 2,986 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today the number has grown to 4,315.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Wisconsin will receive $15.8 million in stimulus money on rarely used bridges. One rural bridge in Iowa County, which carries only about 10 cars a day, will receive $430,000.  Meanwhile, over 1,200 bridges deemed in need of immediate repair will receive no stimulus funds.

A state of recovery? Colorado edition.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

In preparation for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Deputy Secretary Ron Sims’ visit today to Pueblo, Colorado to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Colorado’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $3,697,240,000
(=1.8% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

Colorado’s share of population = 1.6%

Colorado’s unemployment rate was 7.3% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.0%.

Colorado’s 8.0% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Colorado lost 84,600 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Colorado’s estimated budget shortfall is $1.5 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Colorado’s number of foreclosed homes was 4,219 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number is has grown to 4,591.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Over a one year period, Colorado spent $247,000 of stimulus money on road signs to designate which construction projects were funded by the stimulus.  An effort to prevent the state from posting more signs failed in late January.

NPR asks, “Who’s buying” the Recovery Summer tour?

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Today, NPR had a segment on the administration’s attempt to convince the American people that the $862 billion economic “stimulus” package has been beneficial.  As NPR reports, the media plan does not appear to be working. Despite a nationwide tour, and dozens of speeches from the president and other Washington officials, approval ratings for the “stimulus” spending bill remain low – as general frustration over Washington’s overspending continues to build.

Given the facts, Americans’ mood should come as no surprise (please see Public Notice’s recent op-ed on the issue). Here is excerpt from the NPR story:

So far this year, Obama has made more than a dozen trips on what the administration refers to as the “White House to Main Street Tour.” He generally tours a business that is adding jobs because of the economic Recovery Act. The speech is very similar from one stop to the next.

“We’ve aimed to grow our economy by harnessing the innovative spirit of the American people,” he said two weeks ago at the groundbreaking for an electric car battery plant in Holland, Mich. “Because we did, shovels will soon be moving earth, and trucks will soon be pouring concrete where we are standing.”

It is an overt sales pitch that Americans appear not to be buying. And there are those who believe that the president, like yesterday’s rock star, has been touring too long.

“Just saying it over and over again is not going to convince anybody that things are really happening,” says Ed Rollins, who was political director in the Reagan White House. “If I were running the political operation at this point in time, anytime I’m outside the White House, I’d be campaigning.”

There is a campaign element to many of these trips. The speeches tend to be in swing states.

“I think the president and his team have been road-testing themes for the midterm” on this economic tour, says former Democratic consultant Bob Shrum, who now teaches at New York University. “Getting a message through takes a long time, and developing that message can also take some time, so I think this is cumulative.”

He says the White House is trying to create a narrative, laying the foundation for when people begin to feel the recovery. That message may take hold when the unemployment rate drops — assuming the unemployment rate drops.

A state of recovery? New Jersey edition.

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

In preparation for President Obama’s visit today to Baker Equipment in Edison, New Jersey to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

New Jersey’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $4,917,700,000
(=2.4% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

New Jersey’s share of population = 2.8%

New Jersey’s unemployment rate was 8.0% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 9.6%.

New Jersey’s 9.6% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

New Jersey lost 68,300 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, New Jersey’s estimated budget shortfall is $10.7 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

New Jersey’s number of foreclosed homes was 3,279 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 7,778.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Federal stimulus funds are being used to purchase $276,000 worth of playground equipment in Atlantic City.