Posts Tagged ‘foreclosure rate’

A state of recovery? New Hampshire edition.

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

In preparation for Vice President Biden’s visit today to Manchester, New Hampshire to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and “mark a Recovery Act milestone,” below are some facts to consider:

New Hampshire’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill received: $395,322,052
This is 0.5% of the $85.7 billion that has been received by states. (Last updated: 8/24/2010)

New Hampshire’s share of the population = 0.4%

New Hampshire’s unemployment rate was 5.5% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; for July 2010, the rate was 5.8%.

New Hampshire’s 5.8% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

New Hampshire lost 5,400 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and July 2010.

For FY2011, New Hampshire is on track to overspend by $365 million. (Last updated: 7/15/2010)

New Hampshire’s number of foreclosed homes was 739 when the “stimulus” was enacted; that number has since grown to 835.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

$145,000 of federal stimulus funds were used to buy iPod Touch’s for sixth graders at Somersworth Middle School in New Hampshire. Superintendent Karen Soule said the devices are important to district’s mission of making students more “technology literate.”

Fiscal Cheat Sheet: Consequences (state)

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

On Friday, the BLS released its regional and state unemployment rates for July.  The situation remained bleak, with 14 states reporting increases in unemployment rates and 18 states reporting no change to unemployment rates.

Other indicators were also disappointing. Home foreclosure rates rose 4% in July, per RealtyTrac.com.  July marked the 17th successive month in which 300,000 or more home fell into foreclosure.  Also, for fiscal year 2011, the combined budget shortfalls for all states is excepted to reach $121.1 billion, per the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Click here to see Bankrupting America’s recently updated “economic cheat sheet of all 50 states” to see how your state fares in comparison to others.

A state of recovery? Washington edition.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

In preparation for President Obama’s visit today to Seattle, Washington to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Washington’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill received: $2,686,849,584
This is 3.1% of the $85.7 billion that has been received by states. (Last updated: 8/10/2010)

Washington’s share of the population = 2.1%

Washington’s unemployment rate was 8.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.9%.

Washington’s 8.9% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Washington lost 68,600 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Washington is on track to overspend by $2.1 billion. (Last updated: 7/15/2010)

Washington’s number of foreclosed homes was 3,076 when the “stimulus” was enacted; that number has since grown to 5,072.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

A highway beautified by fish art in Washington was financed with $10,000 in stimulus funds. 12 silvery Chinook salmon decorated a landscaping median on Canal Drive in Washington.  I’m sure the salmon fish art is beautiful, but spending $10,000 for metal fish smells a little fishy.

The state of the States

Friday, August 13th, 2010

This summer, White House officials have been traveling all over the country on a “Recovery Summer” tour.  The general purpose of the tour is to tout the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus” bill) as essential in saving and creating “millions” of jobs and encouraging economic growth. However, with a stalled economy and growing unemployment, we decided to take a closer look.  We’ve compiled a fact sheet for each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia and have found a very different story than that being told on the “Recovery Summer” tour.

Click here to view the fact sheets and see how your state’s economy has performed since the “stimulus” was enacted.

Administration officials continue “Recovery Summer” tour

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Continuing the Administration’s “Recovery Summer” tour today, the President visits Chicago; Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood visits Columbus, OH; Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Kathleen Merrigan visits Fairfax County, Virginia; and Federal Highways Deputy Administrator Greg Nadeaus visits Brownsville, Texas.

In preparation for Administration officials’ travel to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, we take a closer look at the current economic conditions in these four states.

Illinois

Illinois’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $8,467,750,000
(=3.9% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Illinois’s share of the population = 4.2%

Illinois’s unemployment rate was 8.7% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 10.4%.

Illinois’s 10.4% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

Illinois lost 155,000 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Illinois’s estimated budget shortfall is $13.5 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Illinois’s number of foreclosed homes was 14,218 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 14,732.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Northwestern University received $712,883 to develop a model of machine-generated humor.  The project will “create intelligent comedic performance agents and deploy them both on- and off-line for the enjoyment and illumination of everyday citizens.”

Ohio

Ohio’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $7,874,070,000
(=3.6% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Ohio’s share of the population = 3.8%

Ohio’s unemployment rate was 9.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 10.5%.

Ohio’s 10.5% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

Ohio lost 131,500 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Ohio’s estimated budget shortfall is $3 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Ohio’s number of foreclosed homes was 11,321 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has fallen to 10,639.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

$34 million will be going to Ohio’s John Weld Peck Federal Building in Cincinnati, which is only 46 years old, for a “window makeover.”

Virginia

Virginia’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $5,425,020,000
(=2.5% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Virginia’s share of the population = 2.6%

Virginia’s unemployment rate was 6.1% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 7.0%.

Virginia’s 7.0% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Virginia lost 39,500 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Virginia’s estimated budget shortfall is $1.3 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Virginia’s number of foreclosed homes was 4,823 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 5,855.

Examples of “stimulus” spending:

$80,000 of stimulus funds financed a pedestrian bridge to nowhere in West Virginia.

$51 million was allocated to the Poff Federal building in Roanoke, Virginia for ‘green’ adjustments, such as new windows and lighting.

Texas

Texas’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $14,307,390,000
(=6.5% of the $219 billion that has already been given to states).

Texas’s share of population = 8.1%

Texas’s unemployment rate was 6.8% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.2%.

Texas’s 8.2% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Texas lost 57,700 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Texas’s estimated budget shortfall is $4.6 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Texas’s number of foreclosed homes was 10,527 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 12,175.

A state of recovery? Wisconsin edition.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

In preparation for Transportation Secretary LaHood’s visit today to Watertown, Wisconsin to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Wisconsin’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $3,260,660,000
(=1.6% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

Wisconsin’s share of population = 1.8%

Wisconsin’s unemployment rate was 7.7% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 7.9%.

Wisconsin’s 7.9% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Wisconsin lost 82,000 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Wisconsin’s estimated budget shortfall is $3.4 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Wisconsin’s number of foreclosed homes was 2,986 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today the number has grown to 4,315.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Wisconsin will receive $15.8 million in stimulus money on rarely used bridges. One rural bridge in Iowa County, which carries only about 10 cars a day, will receive $430,000.  Meanwhile, over 1,200 bridges deemed in need of immediate repair will receive no stimulus funds.

A state of recovery? Colorado edition.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

In preparation for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Deputy Secretary Ron Sims’ visit today to Pueblo, Colorado to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Colorado’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $3,697,240,000
(=1.8% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

Colorado’s share of population = 1.6%

Colorado’s unemployment rate was 7.3% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 8.0%.

Colorado’s 8.0% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Colorado lost 84,600 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Colorado’s estimated budget shortfall is $1.5 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

Colorado’s number of foreclosed homes was 4,219 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number is has grown to 4,591.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Over a one year period, Colorado spent $247,000 of stimulus money on road signs to designate which construction projects were funded by the stimulus.  An effort to prevent the state from posting more signs failed in late January.

A state of recovery? New Jersey edition.

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

In preparation for President Obama’s visit today to Baker Equipment in Edison, New Jersey to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

New Jersey’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $4,917,700,000
(=2.4% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

New Jersey’s share of population = 2.8%

New Jersey’s unemployment rate was 8.0% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 9.6%.

New Jersey’s 9.6% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

New Jersey lost 68,300 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, New Jersey’s estimated budget shortfall is $10.7 billion, as of 7/15/2010.

New Jersey’s number of foreclosed homes was 3,279 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 7,778.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

Federal stimulus funds are being used to purchase $276,000 worth of playground equipment in Atlantic City.

A state of recovery? Delaware edition.

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

In preparation for Rural Business Service Administrator Judith Canales’ visit today to Harrington, DE to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

Delaware’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $710,830,000
(=0.4% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

Delaware’s share of the population = 0.3%

Delaware’s unemployment rate was 7.4% when the “stimulus” was enacted; today it is 8.5%.

Delaware’s 8.5% unemployment rate is lower than the national average of 9.5%.

Delaware lost 423,3000 jobs between February 2009 when the “stimulus” was enacted and June 2010.

For FY2011, Delaware’s estimated budget shortfall is $377 million, as of 7/15/2010.

Delaware’s number of foreclosed homes was 273 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has grown to 690.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

A juice importer in Delaware will receive $15.5 million in stimulus funds to build new apple juice storage tanks.

A state of recovery? DC edition.

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

In preparation for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan’s visit today to the groundbreaking of the Gibson Plaza Apartments in DC to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the “stimulus”) and Washington’s plan for the road ahead, below are some facts to consider:

DC’s share of the $862-billion “stimulus” bill awarded: $3,541,550,000
(=1.8% of the $202 billion that has already been given to states).

DC’s share of the population = 0.2%

DC’s unemployment rate was 8.8% when the “stimulus” was enacted in February 2009; today it is 10.0%.

DC’s 10.0% unemployment rate is higher than the national average of 9.5%.

The number of workers in the DC rose from 703,200 when the “stimulus” was enacted, to 711,000 currently.  This translates to 7,800 jobs added.

For FY2011, DC’s estimated budget shortfall is $104 million, as of 7/15/2010.

DC’s number of foreclosed homes was 379 when the “stimulus” was enacted; today that number has fallen to 259.

Example of “stimulus” spending:

The D.C. Department of Transportation will spend $3 million in stimulus money to expand its “Smartbike” program to 500 bikes.