Posts Tagged ‘spending cuts’

POLL: Public Pulse

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Democracy Corps recently conducted a poll in which they asked the relative importance of cutting the budget deficit to economic growth: 51% of likely voters said reducing the budget deficit is so important to the nation’s future that we should consider “bold” spending cuts; 42% would focus on new spending to develop new skills and industries.


According to a Fox News poll, 63% of registered voters believe the government is so big that it is hurting the country. 32% (25% of Independents) said the size of the federal government was not hurting the country.


According to a poll by the Pew Research Center, 69% of registered voters say the budget deficit is “very” important to their vote this year. That’s behind the economy (90%), jobs (88%), health care (78%) and terrorism (71%) in terms of intensity.


Huffington Post on trimming defense overspending

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

National security is among the most important roles of the federal government. This does not mean, however, that we should completely abstain from questioning the size of its budget. As we have reported on several occasions, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has been one of the most outspoken critics of his own department’s budget. Today, the Huffington Post has a thoughtful piece about the debate over government overspending on defense and whether Secretary Gates’ proposals will bring about meaningful reform:

Military spending is moving to the forefront of Washington policy prattle. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates got headlines early this week when he proposed some changes in command structures along with other organization adjustments which in aggregate could save billions of dollars over five years. Skeptics saw the initiative as a ploy to take the steam out of rising concern for the spiral in defense spending at a time of heightened anxiety over long-term budget deficits. In truth, Gates’ cost cutting measures would just nibble around the edge of our vast military establishment, replenished each year by $750 – 800 billion (including ad hoc Iraq/Afghanistan appropriations). For example, he talks of a 30 percent reduction in the number of contractors but is unable to tell Congress how many the Pentagon employs in total — even without counting the 150,000 or so who serve as hired help in our two wars. He foresees defense spending actually going up in real terms — just by a somewhat lesser amount due to his projected cuts.

Just the Facts: Deficit Commission member Sen. Tom Coburn

Friday, August 13th, 2010

SEN. TOM COBURN (R-OK)
Member

Elected to the Senate in 2004, Sen. Coburn is a member of the committees on Judiciary, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Intelligence, Indian Affairs, and Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Before his tenure in the Senate, Sen. Coburn served in the House of Representatives from 1995 to 2001.

Sen. Coburn is probably best known for his opposition to pork barrel spending. In 2005, he tried to block $453 million for two bridges in Alaska, including the infamous “bridge to nowhere.” Sen. Coburn’s attempt failed overwhelmingly. A Senate committee recently approved a Coburn-sponsored bill calling for a database tracking all earmark requests made by lawmakers.

In May, Sen. Coburn wrote to the two chairs of the fiscal commission in favor of a freeze in the Pentagon’s “base” budget (funding for things other than the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) over the next two fiscal years.

Sen. Coburn, an obstetrician, has been dubbed “The Senate’s Dr. No.” The senator has used – some say abused – the power of a single senator to hold up legislation he or she does not favor. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has said of Coburn’s tactics: l think it’s a way an individual tries to exacerbate their power, and it’s really unfortunate.” A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) added: “No wonder it’s so hard to get things done when a handful of junior members insist on a their-way-or-the-highway approach to legislating.”

Gates on spending cuts: “There are no sacred cows.”

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

As we have reported before, Robert Gates, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, has come out in support of trimming his department’s budget over the long run. Today, the Associated Press reports that Gates is pressuring his department to live within its means.

“The department must start setting priorities, making real trade-offs and separating appetites from real requirements,” Gates said.

Gates vowed to review every corner of the budget, including the military’s rising health care costs.

“There are no sacred cows,” Gates said.

Besides shutting down Joint Forces Command, Gates wants to:

- Trim by 10 percent the budget for contractors who support the Defense Department;

- Freeze the number of employees working for his office, defense agencies and combatant commands for the next three years; and

- Cut at least 50 general and flag officer positions and 150 senior civilian executive positions over the next two years.

Other departments could certainly learn a thing or two from Secretary Gates. Unfortunately, today Washington will be engaged in belt-loosening, not tightening, as Congress is set to vote this afternoon on a measure that will cost taxpayers $26 billion.

New report shows GDP growth slows

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Today, the Commerce Department released its advance estimate of second quarter GDP growth.  The report showed that the United States economy slowed to a 2.4% rate of growth.  This is a significant decline from the revised 3.7% rate of the previous three months.

The report also showed that government spending increased. A New York Times article outlining the findings reports that government spending grew “at an annual rate of 4.4 percent after a decline of 1.6 percent in the first quarter. Public spending was broad-based, with even state and local spending increasing for the first time in a year.”

It’s crucial that lawmakers heed the public’s call for fiscal responsibility.  With growth slowing and government spending increasing, Congress must make difficult but necessary cuts to get at the root cause of what is Bankrupting America: its out-of-control spending.

Bernanke says extending tax cuts could be stimulative

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Three Senate Democrats have said it. As have a couple House Democrats. And yesterday, Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke joined them.

The topic? Whether to raise taxes on income, capital gains, estates, and dividends by allowing the 2001 and 2003 tax laws to expire.

According to The Hill, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said extending the tax cuts enacted during President George W. Bush’s administration could provide a boost to the economy.

Bernanke said, “In the short-term, I would believe that we ought to maintain a reasonable degree of fiscal support, stimulus for the economy.” (Note: at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said it’s likely the Administration will let at least some of the tax cuts expire.)

Bernanke was also asked if spending cuts would help restore confidence in the economy and get it going again.

“We need to look at all the programs for their merits, both in terms of their short-term stimulative effects and also in terms of how well they would support growth in the long term.”

POLL: Public Pulse

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

The Economist’s weekly poll asked registered voters about their view of government. 51.9% think the “less government the better.” 48.1% thought government should be doing more.


Democracy Corps asked likely voters about the policies they thought would best stimulate the economy and create jobs. 43% said the government should “invest more” to help the economy and create jobs. 50% said the best way to get the economy moving again and create jobs was to “cut” government spending and taxes.


White House calls for ideas to SAVE money

Friday, July 9th, 2010

The White House announced yesterday the launch of its second annual SAVE (Saving American’s Value and Efficiency) award. The award asks federal government workers to submit their best money-saving ideas. The winner gets to meet with the President and his or her idea earns a spot in the Administration’s next budget.

The ideas are compiled on this website, where average Americans can weigh in. The White House also tracks ideas submitted last year that are being implemented.

These cuts and efficiencies will generally save thousands or millions of dollars each so they won’t go that far in tackling our $13 trillion debt (which is almost the size of our entire economy), but this is a good step in the right direction, nonetheless. And it mirrors the type of decisions families around America have to make when it comes to their own budgets.

Top 3: last week’s most popular posts

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

VIDEO: How to create one million jobs

Wednesday Waste: stimulus funds for casino

50 simple ways to cut spending


U.S. calls for spending as world calls for cutting

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

As Washington continues to debate how much more to spend on attempts to stimulate the U.S. economy (see an earlier discussion between New York Times columnist Paul Krugman and former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan), for German chancellor Angela Merkel the question is not how much to spend. but how much to cut.

USA Today reports how European leaders are acting quickly on controlling deficit spending while the U.S sits idly.  “The Europeans are not waiting for a (fiscal) commission, or the next election, or some kind of alignment of stars. They don’t believe they have any time to waste and are pushing forward now.”

The Chicago Tribune pointed out that you know the U.S. has gone down the wrong road when spendaholic European governments are lecturing the country on fiscal responsibility.  The article stresses that the rest of the stimulus should be spent before pouring on even more deficit spending.

In reaction to the G-20 meetings, the LA Times reports that the G-20 conference reached a compromise to halve the budget deficits by 2013.  In response to the agreement, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper remarked, “We must recognize that our fiscal health tomorrow will rest in no small measure on our ability to create jobs and growth today.”

CBS News commented that President Obama stood alone at the G-20 conference in his push for continued stimulus spending.  However, this argument did not take hold as other countries put reducing the debt as their top priority.

Last week, Reuters reported that European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet commended Germany’s plant to cut their budget by $80 billion euros.  Trichet noted he did not believe the austerity measure would bring the country to stagnation.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Merkel argued that increased spending could exacerbate the country’s rising public debt.  She prefers that Germany continue to focus on export growth.

European Union officials supported Germany’s push for fiscal discipline, and in a letter to G-20 nations Wednesday, said the recovery was happening faster than expected and the time for stimulus spending is over.

The Hill newspaper recently called the U.S. “isolated” in its continued pursuit of deficit spending in attempt to spur economic growth, noting that Germany, France, Great Britain, Canada and Japan all have plans to reduce spending.